Hi @GoldDigger! Thanks for your post and questions. I appreciate...

Hi @GoldDigger!

Thanks for your post and questions. I appreciate and respect the manner of your post. @Christopher67, @Aussie Eagle, and even @Ex Oyster farmer's last post and 'Like' to my response, was respected.

"The first question I have is when did you place your order and how long does is take to receive your order."

Refer to Post #:60156911



There has been a delay due to some COVID staff issues, I have been informed. It is only 1 week overdue.

"Secondly, you state that you were asked to come back and try and present some other perspectives and see if you can make head nor tail out of this debacle. Who asked you to come back? Sholom Feldman? A company representative? Or some of these shareholders/friends/family you have an interest in?"

I was asked by some of my friends, who are CGB shareholders if I would consider braving the current sentiment and try and correct or discuss some of the misinformation being posted that doesn't match CGB's announcements. I volunteered to come back on; not at the request of Sholom, CGB or as a paid spruiker. My posts, as you have seen, are not 'rar..rar..CGB posts.

And what debacle are you referring to?

I used the word debacle, referring to a fiasco, playing out on this forum.

The share price and losses are horrendous for shareholders but even on some delisted or suspended stocks on HC, there are still 'some' pro-company posters who want to believe the company can be restored. CGB is nowhere near being bankrupt.

IMO, for the board level experience of a specca, I believe that CGB has employed a fiscally responsible approach to managing expenditure and preserving funds until the company can deliver on revenues. Yet, from my observation of commentary, $10ML for a MicroCap is now being treated as a bad thing for shareholders with this company.

Again GD, my observation of observing this forum over possibly 18 months, is that anyone who tries to post something positive, is either tackled or motives questioned, not by one poster but by groups of posters. A few years ago @pubtrader would not have been questioned at all over requesting a discount. VitaHemp was offering a standard discount for nearly 2 years. It was a valid question.

Re the above comment: I was often tackled about confirmation bias, being too positive and not balanced, so I changed, and yet there are posters here who never changed their stance from being negative and are never challenged on that. With respect, to my experience in media, I believe that what we are seeing here on this forum, is the result of negative bias from 4 years of struggles.

The debacle, you asked me to clarify, I believe, is a direct result of a falling share price for sure, but there has been IMO, serious neglect and denial of influential commercial events that have been allowed to play out on this forum which again, IMHO, has seriously soured sentiment for CGB.

RE the other factors I will address in detail when I think it might be appropriate or can help.

Cheers...Neil