Cokal's largest shareholder will inevitably increase the...

Cokal's largest shareholder will inevitably increase the debt facility imo. The project will not fail nor will it go to 4c or $40m MC as some claim. Everybody needs to chill out and stop listening to the apocalyptic scenarios being spewed on here.
To the doomsday advocates, where is your evidence for the following?
1. mining and therefore production has ceased.
2. barging from Krajan to BT has ceased.
3. Roads are not being utilised for coal delivery.
4. Cokal will not be able to access further funds from its keystone investor or will require over 40% dilution to raise $25m. ((LOL)
5. Cokal is not sorting out the barging logistics to deliver their product.
6. This proposed joint venture in logistics will not be favourable for Cokal
7. that Cokal doesn't have other customers lined up once logistics firmly ironed out.
If you have this evidence, then you may be the one's who may be accused of insider trading. LOL.
Management haven't lied as some claim. They do not control barges from other companies. Is it possible there could be another reason for the delay to pick up ONE shipment? Or does it all have to be an end of the world scenario? Maybe mgt want to address the issue with all the solutions to any problems that have arisen before they announce anything?
I for one, really like this announcement today. It creates a symbiotic relationship for both companies. Petrindo do not start production until Qtr 1 and they would also have very difficult logistics if it were not for Cokal. So this works well for both companies and should be delivered as a priority. Petrindo doesn't not come in with a position of power as claimed, as they will end up with a stranded asset.
So if funding is not the issue, that would mean the logistics will be sorted in time. In the meanwhile production and sales will continue, albeit at a reduced rate. Then what happens after the logistics are running? Ramp up in every way.