IMO James putting in slide 3 was like a prosecution lawyer...

IMO James putting in slide 3 was like a prosecution lawyer asking a question/making a statement against a witness, or defendant, knowing it would objected too, and the objection sustained... (please remove that comment from the records and the Jury will disregard).

Nonetheless the jury cannot unhear what was said/suggested like you cannot put toothpaste back in the tube. (I wonder how many shorters will try to prove you can put toothpaste back in tonight )

I particularly liked that in the presentation JM made mention of the orphan period before production. i.e. talked to slide 3

I have all the trolls on ignore as they do not add any value.

For the record I phone and email James when I believe it is appropriate for my research. Right now I am comfortable and rather JM had less interruptions as I know he has been working 7 days a week for us SHs.

At the end of the day you can listen to the interview and believe his update or you can believe the trolls with no skin in the game other than their agenda.

GLTAH