Ann: MRG HMS - New High Quality Mineral Assemblage Results, page-59

I was referring to changes in the definition of ilmenite form the July 2019 assemblage release (>50% TiO2). I assume that MRQ's early definition of ilmenite, which specifically excluded low-Ti Ilm, was a 'like-for-like' comp with the Corridor 1 deposit up the road. After all, Corridor 1 was held out as the world-class peer comparison they were aiming to replicate. Numbers were very similar, but it looks more a coincidence now.


I'm not saying low-Ti Ilm should not be included into the 'Ilmenite' grouping, if it reports to the 32% of HMC ilmenite product produced by IHC Robiins recent mineral separation test work. It was flagged back in July 19 that the low-Ti Ilm might be a valuable addition to the ilmenite proportion. However, that would mean that July 19 surface assemblage work reported 60-65% Ilmenite by the current >30% TiO2 definition, depending on how much was above/below 30%. Certainly there was more than zero >20% but <30% TiO2 low-Ilm Ti-mag...