We are coming at this from two very different angles, and it is exhausting. You are fixated on academic issues i.e. difference between IP, patent, trademark etc. I am focused on the value proposition in an acquistion/sale scenario.
It completely misses the point that I raised when @vfpa5000000 was saying that Team17 might seek to acquire PLY at a 50-100% premium when I questioned why pay such a premium for a company that does not own anything particularly valuable?
Please try to stay at least two steps behind.
Ann: PlaySide & Team17 sign Long-Term Publishing Agreement, page-46
Add PLY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
87.0¢ |
Change
0.025(2.96%) |
Mkt cap ! $346.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 84.5¢ | 87.0¢ | 84.5¢ | $241.3K | 281.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1599 | 91.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 84.5¢ | 88 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 15/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
87.0¢ |
Change
0.025 ( 2.38 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 83.5¢ | 87.0¢ | 83.5¢ | 87423 | ||
| Last updated 15.58pm 15/05/2024 ? | |||||
| PLY (ASX) Chart |