Yes, the cost should be plus LCE conversion cost. I am neutral about this stock. The PFS is actually looking good, with all the numbers meeting/exceeding expectation for a DLE developer. But the only confusion is the team doesn't treat it as a major project compared to the Big Sandy given how great the board believes it is. If the project is going to expand to >20ktpa LCE in 5 yrs, they should not say it's a short-term goal while the Big Sandy is the long-term goal (as what Paul said in an earlier interview). But I don't see anything that should lead to a selloff at this level. If there are some hidden difficulties that limit the project to become a bigger one, than the current valuation is probably fair.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZL
- Ann: Prairie Lithium PFS Confirms Extremely Low Operating Cost
Ann: Prairie Lithium PFS Confirms Extremely Low Operating Cost, page-100
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 86 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $89.47M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.1¢ | 2.1¢ | 2.0¢ | $62.87K | 3.086M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
10 | 1516895 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.1¢ | 1669256 | 7 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
10 | 1516895 | 0.019 |
23 | 4460349 | 0.018 |
23 | 5128231 | 0.017 |
17 | 5556412 | 0.016 |
22 | 6123388 | 0.015 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.021 | 1669256 | 7 |
0.022 | 2842962 | 11 |
0.023 | 10319028 | 10 |
0.024 | 4405063 | 15 |
0.025 | 4238744 | 13 |
Last trade - 13.55pm 16/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AZL (ASX) Chart |