Yes, the cost should be plus LCE conversion cost. I am neutral about this stock. The PFS is actually looking good, with all the numbers meeting/exceeding expectation for a DLE developer. But the only confusion is the team doesn't treat it as a major project compared to the Big Sandy given how great the board believes it is. If the project is going to expand to >20ktpa LCE in 5 yrs, they should not say it's a short-term goal while the Big Sandy is the long-term goal (as what Paul said in an earlier interview). But I don't see anything that should lead to a selloff at this level. If there are some hidden difficulties that limit the project to become a bigger one, than the current valuation is probably fair.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZL
- Ann: Prairie Lithium PFS Confirms Extremely Low Operating Cost
Ann: Prairie Lithium PFS Confirms Extremely Low Operating Cost, page-100
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 86 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $76.05M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.7¢ | 1.7¢ | 1.6¢ | $215.9K | 13.15M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 3292502 | 1.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.7¢ | 588275 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 3292502 | 0.016 |
26 | 6462585 | 0.015 |
19 | 5214433 | 0.014 |
8 | 4958333 | 0.013 |
4 | 2600000 | 0.012 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.017 | 588275 | 2 |
0.018 | 490953 | 6 |
0.019 | 1256774 | 8 |
0.020 | 2645966 | 13 |
0.021 | 3008874 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 31/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AZL (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO
Anthony Noble
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online