So which ever amount happens to be the correct loss on the...

So which ever amount happens to be the correct loss on the Anaergia project then that is the minimum reduction to expect in the installed costs for future installations of small to modest sizes MWh sized installations once the ZBM3 moves to mass production.

What is your issue then? Don't you think a blow molded design, with other significant production efficiencies like a single board BMS, one electrode stack rather than 2 and other changes with a predominantly or entirely automated build rather than a manual build can dramatically reduce the cost of goods?

For ongoing MWh installations I would also expect production efficiencies to be achieved in the other components of an Energy Pod Z.

The other distinct possibility is the reduced cost of freight if manufacturing begins in North America. That may happen if the initial interest being generated become sales.

"There has been significant interest in the Redflow solution and the Anaergia project generated with a number of additional site tours requested for this quarter."

From https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/RFX/02480825.pdf