I sense that you have gone defensive with this response, I'm not sure why that would be.
Do you not have any thoughts around:
You picked up on water, why did you not mention that a decrease in cement was a major difference. Producing cement produces a huge amount of co2. The report shows a reduction in cement required from 200.4 to 183.7 for 32mpa.
As for the pricing increasing for 25mpa, when the aus govt finally introduces the need for companies to either offset or purchase credits this won't matter.
Ann: Results of Concrete Decarbonisation Study, page-164
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 192 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
