to what extent should a producing mine Mt.C. be directly related...

to what extent should a producing mine Mt.C. be directly related to a non-executed SPP
and to what extent should this affect/influence the exploration work in a sustainable (!) way?

When I read here some comments - also in other boards too -, in my opinion, currently
in many companiesthe coffers are plundered, the managers gets a brain-amputation -
although until yesterday we felt their work was fine - the gold ounces in the ground by
means "of whatever" will be snatched from the ground.

may I get you the answer ? : NOTHING AT ALL !!!

if you believe (!) in your investment, has made his dd, and isconvinced that the
successes made so far will be continued - i remember our enthusiasm when we
get the mine - will agree with the above answer.

that it comes from time to time to volatility is probably normal, especially if you consider
the very current circumstances (inflation,war, pm prices, etc.). personally, I am
currently heavily under water, but I am pretty sure thatthe price will recover well in the
next q or the one after that,as the mine will show their capable contribution to cost-
covering and therefore I can sleep - surely as well - as user oldgold.

currently the sp stands at about a quarter of the sp high (oct.2020).
taking into account what positive changes have occurred here since oct. 2020and
the associated reduction in risk.
Is anyone here really of the opinion that we are too high priced ?in comparison, there
are plenty of companies that do not even have 10%of what we are able to offer, but
considerably higher (share-price).ultimately, the basis should be facts and reliable
figures. Think about this.

Please excuse I´m no native.

to all holders , have a nice weekend and stay safe

elsolivars