No guarantee the stacks in the X10 and ZBM3 will remain...

No guarantee the stacks in the X10 and ZBM3 will remain identical to what it was or is.


From page 11

At the very least cooling per stack will be a more modular option assuming the X10 and ZBM3 share the same stack.

Will the source of the carbon, how it is derived, will it be the same? Or the membrane, has that changed, or is it going to?

The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (UQ) project Extending Flow Battery Operation is a 4 year program, only about 1 1/2 years in, over 2 years to go. Will ongoing findings make it into the X10?
From https://redflow.com/project/redflow-to-collaborate-with-the-university-of-queensland-to-lower-battery-storage-costs

And a bit more evolution;

From page 21

I'm wondering if there is anything more hiding behind the e.g., I'd have thought i.e. would have been enough if that was the only change. If there is it will hopefully be protected by a patent.

Yes, re your post, there may have been dwindling support from investors over time but it seems various governments at various levels, in some countries, are willing to step in, the California Energy Commission was the first for Redflow. Most probably with due diligence (I'd hope so, public money etc) and also probably with strings attached. With loans, grants and equity it seems. About 2 1/2 years on things are a bit different.