SPL 0.00% 9.9¢ starpharma holdings limited

Ann: TGA infringement notices for alleged advertising, page-96

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 252 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 9
    Before JF & BOD are run down too far by posters re the TGA fines, have a read of this article from Pharmadispatch.com a few days ago. There are obviously inconsistencies in regulation and SPL just got the short straw. I'm not medically trained but I do understand being on the wrong side of inconsistent regulation. (Still have full faith in JF and the BOD as well.....but each to their own, hey)
    Its not from the subscription only section so now trouble posting

    Here's the text and a copy attached as well:

    Regulator has opened the door to more direct-to-consumer
    advertising
    July 8, 2021

    Medicines Australia might need to amend its Code of Conduct given the TGA's interpretation of the laws
    it administers that it says permit the provision direct-to-consumer of information about PBS-listed brands
    of prescription medicines.
    The regulator's administration of these laws has become increasingly confused.
    In the past week, it has fined Australian biotechnology company Starpharma for the "unlawful
    advertising" of its anti-COVID-19 nasal spray Viraleze while at the same time giving the green light to the
    publication of resources that advertise by brand some PBS-listed medicines for the treatment of
    inflammatory bowel disease.
    The fine imposed on Starpharma was multi-faceted, including the fact Viraleze is not yet approved for
    use in Australia. Yet the fine was also imposed because, according to the regulator, the company's
    promotion of the product "included a restricted representation claiming that Viraleze is an antiviral nasal
    spray that stops SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19."
    According to the regulator's statement announcing the fine against Starpharma, "Any claims or
    references to preventing or treating a serious form of a disease, condition, ailment or defect
    are restricted representations.
    "Under the Act, the use of restricted representations in advertisements for therapeutic goods is unlawful
    without the prior authorisation of the TGA. No relevant authorisation has been granted for the advertised
    claims in this case."
    This action against the Australian company was consistent with the TGA's general approach to the
    application of the laws for advertising therapeutic interventions. The regulator tends to administer this
    law to a very high and consistent standard - almost punitive - presumably because it wants to maintain a
    deterrent.
    Yet at the very same time the TGA was imposing this fine on Starpharma, it was defending its failure to
    act against the Targeted Therapies Alliance for its promotion of some brands of PBS-listed medicines for
    the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The resources published by the alliance do not delineate
    between forms of disease or identify all potential treatments, including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).
    The alliance's resources clearly include "claims or references to preventing or treating a serious form of
    a disease, condition, ailment or defect" and they have not been authorised. Where are the sanctions?
    Yet not only has the regulator failed to authorise the resources, but it also says it is not required for these
    resources targeting patients - the public - with brand name PBS-listed medicines and the disease they
    treat.
    The TGA fined and publicly shamed Starpharma but has taken no action against the Targeted Therapies
    Alliance. Why?
    The implications of its failure to act or impose actions - go forth and advertise
    Starpharma might question the magnitude of its fine given the regulator's 'green light' for the Targeted
    Therapies Alliance.The wider implication is the TGA's apparent support for some forms of direct-to-consumer advertising of
    prescription medicines.
    The Medicines Australia Code of Conduct (Code) is written to reflect the requirements of the Therapeutic
    Goods Act 1989 (Act). The Code does not currently permit brand promotion to consumers of PBS-listed
    medicines.
    However, given the regulator's position on the Targeted Therapies Alliance, it appears the law allows a
    company to issue a media release including information on and links to publicly accessible websites
    hosting material about a disease and their PBS-listed treatment.
    Based on the TGA's responses to questions about the Targeted Therapies Alliance, this material can
    include the brand, its benefits and the disease itRegulator has opened the door to more direct-to-consumer advertising.pdf
    treats. The material will not need to delineate between
    forms of the disease or mention alternative treatments and it will not be considered advertising to the
    extent it will not need to be authorised.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add SPL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
9.9¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $41.39M
Open High Low Value Volume
9.9¢ 10.3¢ 9.9¢ $278.7K 2.781M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 73885 9.9¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
10.0¢ 6037 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
SPL (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.