BD. Suggest you ignore the bate. Your logic is spot-on and would be uderstood by all-1.
BTW - PWC published a paid-for report based on information provided to them in good-faith. There was no audit of that information nor did PWC say it was correct.
BD. Suggest you ignore the bate. Your logic is spot-on and would...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)