Flip, you are confusing ore reserve, resource statement and PFS assumptions.
this is the ore reserve statement, all in USD, and actually sulphate not getting a premium right now.
are you saying AUZ has a better repost than ARL based on this? Where is this table wrong (i.e. be specific and don't rely on vague assertions)
Ore reserve statement ARL AUZ 1 Mt 40.13 57 2 Ni grade 0.82 0.58 3 Co grade 0.09 0.08 4 contained nickel (approx 329,066.00 330,600.00 5 contained cobalt (approx) 36,117.00 45,600.00 6 Latest Cut off grade assumptions ($US) .81% Ni Eq, Nickel price $15,120/t, Co price 96,000/t .4 - .45% Ni Eq, Nickel price $19,841/t, Co price 66,137/t
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ARL vs AUz vs CLQ
Flip, you are confusing ore reserve, resource statement and PFS...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ARL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
48.0¢ |
Change
0.015(3.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $95.84M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
46.8¢ | 48.0¢ | 45.5¢ | $11.78K | 25.18K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 81978 | 45.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
50.0¢ | 23716 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 60000 | 0.455 |
4 | 25700 | 0.450 |
2 | 21000 | 0.435 |
3 | 22000 | 0.430 |
1 | 5 | 0.425 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.500 | 9166 | 2 |
0.530 | 50950 | 1 |
0.560 | 15000 | 1 |
0.595 | 6009 | 1 |
0.700 | 1968 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.56pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ARL (ASX) Chart |