Have a look.
Where’s the grade/recovery sweet spot for Mount Mann which is being mined NOW?
How about NWF?
Why can KV achieve this feat whereas the mt holland deposit with a higher grade of 1.52% using dms can only manage 5.5 across their tests as per their dfs? The message? The KV deposit must have low deleterious elements? Is it a solid homogeneous deposit just 1.8 x 1.2 km, not like another peer which will blast billions of tonnes out of 6 pits stretching over 9km?
Kv Grade control drills have delivered results as expected, hence reducing if not eliminating unpleasant surprises. Is Kv effectively the next greenbushes with sector leading esg? What did the mining journal say.
ASX Today, page-39770
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.49 |
Change
-0.005(0.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.612B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.50 | $1.54 | $1.44 | $13.95M | 9.418M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 21569 | $1.49 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.49 | 14401 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 20/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.49 |
Change
-0.005 ( 0.75 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| $1.51 | $1.54 | $1.44 | 2421647 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 20/05/2024 ? | |||||
| LTR (ASX) Chart |