"No one can prove leprechauns don't exist. The burden of proof...

"No one can prove leprechauns don't exist. The burden of proof is to prove that something does exist, not the other way around."

So after all this time you now admit that the source doesn't actually matter and what matters is the logic - in particular the burden of proof.

Good to know. It's your burden to prove vaccines work (as that is the positive claim) which you can't do except with invalid data.

If only you had done this months ago when you told us that we had to believe in the positive claim of climate change because your scientific sources like Lidia Thorpe and Chris Bowen said so.