Court Links for Hearings, page-171

First 171 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
JoeGambler

7,069 Posts.

1947

15/09/22

10:55

Post #: 63712431
Share

Originally posted by gregbris: ↑

i think we will be waiting longer for that proof then a court resolution. they could just get a screen shot off a friend, so it would prove nothing really ... until they sell.

just like other 'holders' banging the drum - lots of buyers but they don't actually want to sell - why? do they actually hold or they believe the positive and are trying to buy more shares for a discount? maybe trying to get public support for a 'broken system'?

where is the media reporting of this - you know how media used to be, balanced. Have all journalists lost their spine? i believe as mentioned by Rudd - some media empires have too much power Murdock was named.

one of the same MO as others :
- seems to support then switch path for no reason
- ask the same old 'information gathering' questions ad nauseam
- saying they want to sell but don't when the offers come rolling in
- plan old trolls
- baiting
- trying to bully posters
- having multiple accounts
- creating new accounts
- blocking statistics

Expand

So a poster that was supportive of ISX initially, but then moved to critical after new developments in the saga, is an "insidious" troll that actually deliberately started out as positive, knowing full well the plan was to turn negative and hoodwink loyal shareholders after trust was gained?

"Prove you're a shareholder!"

Seriously, you realise that as the facts change you are allowed to change an opinion?

Last edited by JoeGambler: 15/09/22

SP1 Price at posting: $1.07 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
5 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply