Well if you read the wording In the post by @mogga which I posted a few minutes ago you will see that there's nothing but alarmist claims about dna contamination which was raised at the enquiry by Professor Buckhaults. So the validity of the claim comes down to the Professor, as it should at this point in time. The problem is that the article that Mogga posted has very conveniently omitted, or maybe Mogga edited, a very relevant fact regarding the Professors views on Mrna Vaccines. . As follows from the same enquiry-
Buckhaults is not an alarmist and has been reluctant to go public with his findings for fear of frightening people.He himself was vaccinated three times with Pfizer’s covid vaccine and recommended it to family and friends. He described the mRNA platform technology as “revolutionary” and said the vaccine has saved many lives.“I’m a real fan of this platform,” Buckhaults told the Senate. “I think it has the potential to treat cancers, I really believe that this platform is revolutionary. In your lifetime, there will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer.
So you see how articles being posted as fact by people in this forum can be very misleading and corrupting. They suck in the gullible which they are designed to do.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED
COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED, page-93989
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,634 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO
Anthony Noble
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online