Deciphering Lynas, page-966

This post is in Response to Buffets post saying I should not post on the TA board. Not sure it belongs here but this is the closest I can find.

Though I have held a lot of shares in past I have not held for a couple of years. Not sure where you think i said I was holding.

Yes AL did say 10.5K I will not believe her till I see some up lift in production I would be a lot more convinced if I saw 2000T in a Q. Or 3 Qs in a row with the following pattern 1800 T 1900T then 1850 T. For me 3 months of steady next rate production or above would be a positive sign.

A very simple question to You. First over half the post here are not TA why am I the only one you get upset Just scroll back and look.

Explain why you did not object to these posts in the last day Post #: 71252281 Post #: 71243425 Post #: 71242942 Post #: 71241815Post #: 71241018Post #: 71240614 Post #: 71242942 Post #: 71242942t
Two of these are yours, Why do you not do what you say? Oh I know you were just replying to me but that was what I was doing to Pout and his argument had TA in it. If you are going to take on the roll of policing then be consistent. If not just report me and we will see what happens.

I posted a reply to Pouts TA post Post #: 71234949. I will admit he put in many qualifies but based on upvotes and GA he received I doubt many absorbed his qualifiers. So I posted my arguments (not based on TA) to why Prices will not rise in the next few weeks. I did say next few days would see a rise. Could you tell me where an argument against TA belongs if not in the TA section. Just explain where you would have put it and why. why it is Ok for you to reply to me with nothing about TA but totally wrong for me to reply to Pouts TA post.

As far as blocking I block no one. I agree many have me blocked. The people telling me they have blocked me seem to never argue with facts and data and just do not want to see what I say because their arguments are week and do not hold up.