Hi dull1122
You are rewriting history when you say: "They are all accurate with the exception of a typo in converting the Kvanefjeld NaF level but forward by the company in their 2008 annual report at 2.01% Villamite level which translates to an NaF level of 20,100 ppm instead of my typo of 20,900ppm."
OK. That was a typo - but of little significance.
You made a more significant inaccuracy in your post Post #: 40832769. There you wrote that the NaF level "translates to a level of 20, 900,000 ppm."
It is an impossible value, but damaging to GGG in the eyes of readers who don't understand parts per million (ppm).
Think about it. Wouldn't you love to own shares in a gold mine that produced 20,999,000 ppm of gold for every million units of dirt it extracted?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETM
- EIA Report
EIA Report, page-202
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.99M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | $18.03K | 819.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 577254 | 2.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.4¢ | 101094 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 577254 | 0.021 |
2 | 2384005 | 0.020 |
6 | 1557772 | 0.019 |
3 | 1949857 | 0.018 |
1 | 625000 | 0.016 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.024 | 101094 | 1 |
0.025 | 290329 | 7 |
0.028 | 1463126 | 3 |
0.029 | 120000 | 1 |
0.030 | 138094 | 2 |
Last trade - 13.03pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |