Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Did I read the first post in this thread incorrectly? Was it not...

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
boomeronrations

7,758 Posts.

361

17/05/18

13:51

Post #: 33163696
Share

Originally posted by Ponzi ↑

Labor's franking credit change will will have "no material impact on net investment returns", AustralianSuper spokesman

So you would consider "no material impact on net investment returns" (as quoted from AFR article) to be equivalent to "Would I continue to receive the benefits of franking credits within a SMSF"? Two entirely different scenarios, just ask the 900,000 disgruntled retirees that stand to lose their FC refunds (real money, not a notion) should Shorten's thought bubble come to fruition.

Expand

Did I read the first post in this thread incorrectly?
Was it not asking whether one continues to benefit from franking credits in pension phase , in an industry fund?
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

NUZ

Neurizon significantly advances NUZ-001, enters global licensing agreement

I88

Infini Resources onto Phase 2 at Portland Creek after spotting 'widespread uranium'

ASX Market Open: Yet more Wall Street highs to flow on to gaining Oz shares | July 4

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

First 5 Last

SPONSORED BY