You can see parallels with the way Dan Andrews is treated by the journos who just eat out of the palm of his hand.
No kickback, no real scrutiny, everyone holding each other’s hand, not rocking the boat, all to protect ‘the cause’. Even his ‘enquiry’ seems a half baked effort, and not really designed to achieve anything significant.
It takes an ‘outsider’ like Credlin to rock the cozy cohort, to try to get to the truth of the matter.
I suspect the climate industry works in a similar way. It’s generally not in anyone’s interest to rock the boat.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 3)
Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 3), page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)