Hi Loutcrop and other people who can to weigh in, You've...

Hi Loutcrop and other people who can to weigh in,

You've probably seen this, but this is the only hole I can find where they've drilled deep enough in the NE corner (MTDD008 - approx, 600m south of GAL's discovery hole, or 400m south of the boundary).

Looking at GAL's depth to mineralisation and the underlying sediments, is the depth range of interest within CNJ-GSR's hole at or above the sulphidic sediments then? Is the sediment layer important as the country rock source of sulphides for the PGE emplacement? Or am I on the wrong track?

The sulphidic sediment depth in the CNJ-GSR hole is about ~100m RL.GAL's discovery hole is closer to 200m RL and therefore shallower... GSR-CNJ also noted in an old Quarterly Report of also finding sediments in MTDD09, and mapped 'cherty sediments' towards that region towards the west (also shown on the cross-section).

My main Q would be - is it a slight concern that sulphides were not intersected above the sediment layer in MTDD008? They did find a ~10m sulphide section directly underneath the sediments/contact (with 0.3% nickel).

Regards