It’s interesting to see this banter play out from the side...

It’s interesting to see this banter play out from the side lines.

Jimmy and John, you both provide positive input from very divergent sides of the fence.

Jimmy - your diligence with respect to the discovery of Netflix copy righted material will not go unnoticed by the appropriate stakeholders and I will suspect the appropriate correspondence to be sent to TV2u for their sins.

Further to this you have called out the failures of the company to accurately protect geolocation content to the appropriate region or even basically level content security (AES or DRM).

This subsequent lack of blocking of the content protection would of triggered content security reports to the content owners - not a good thing for any company seeking premium content

Finally , the use of third party tech such as Amazon and bitmovin Suggest any IVAN achiteciture is either not commercialised, not mature or not approved by hollywood content distribution.

As you stated early in 2017, the true value of this company is it underlying value in technology and the potential revenue ) assuming this is actually TV2u’s


John, your commercial insight and personal access to the company do provide a level hope to those holders who think the company can be grow.

I would be interested to understand if TV2u has been granted a broadcast license as they are the underlying provider of the solution and how their content has been approved for distribution with out such a license .

If this is not made available then no Indonesia will ever occur.


I would suggest an analytic approach used by Owl v Fox and Taincrow will Yield the most accurate results as company communication is been poor

As always DYOR as there seems to be a lot of posting with a clear lack of understanding of this technology and business