General comments/chat, page-39724

Might be a good time to review the original if its still applicable.

The valuation assessment of the project indicates that it has an internal rate of return of 36%, which is well
above the 8% risked rate of return.
The sensitivity analysis carried out indicates that valuation is most sensitive to changes in commodity prices,
exchange rates and yield. Valuation is less sensitive to changes in the other assessed variables.
The results of the economic evaluation show that when negatively sensitising the following multiple
financial inputs for the entire operating period, the Project still has a positive NPV and IRR of 21%:
Product prices decrease by 10%
Operating costs and capital expenditure increase by 10%
AUD appreciates by 10%.
This indicates that the Project economics could withstand an unlikely negative swing on all major inputs
based upon the parameters and assumptions used in this DFS.
The Project, as currently structured, has Ore Reserves sufficient for 28 years of mining.
The Project has a strong resource and reserve base when compared with its peer projects.
Using expected financial and marketing parameters, on a pre-tax basis, the Project has a robust:
NPV of $613 million
IRR of 36%

https://www.andromet.com.au/assets/Great-White-Project-DFS-and-Updated-Ore-Reserve_2022-04-06-013627_dvmk.pdf

Of the three main influencers stated all have moved in our favour from my understanding.

Original assumption was AUD @ 0.70 to USD Its currently 0.65.
Transport costs going down
Expected capital expenditure going down