Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I heard during the week that Vic was trialing HCQ as a...

First 145 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
LoadedDog

14,291 Posts.

11

20/09/20

12:58

Post #: 47482360
Share

Originally posted by BugGold: ↑

So it seems that after a lot of the huffing and puffing and time wasting the hydroxychloroquine status quo remains..............

That there is a gulf of difference between those presenting information in good faith and the big pharma guys on here.

One of these core differences seems to be the absolute reticence for these guys to produce any of the so called studies discrediting NCQ + its adjuvants (such as antibiotics and zinc) within the parameters commonly ascribing to some success. All you get is reports of studies or links to the irrelevant. You can almost put money on a link now being provided to one of the misrepresentative studies (well maybe not now that I mentioned it)

Sure, we know there are studies where people were OD'd, treated on their last legs (on ventilators etc), treated without the full co administrations and on and on. But where are the 'official' big pharma studies within the parameters. It cannot be a accidental oversight. (and yes I expect a 'So what are these parameters' obtuseness to present itself).

Those interested in progress will just await further information as it comes to hand..........

Expand

I heard during the week that Vic was trialing HCQ as a prophylactic in a blind test among front line nurses. A quick search came up blank so maybe I misheard, I think it was on the radio.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...

First 145 Last