One word correction in above post: We also know that ASX are...

One word correction in above post:  We also know that ASX are going to continue to add reasons for not lifting the suspension given the email we evidenced between Kevin Lewis, ASX, which KL sent to Clayton Utz which was witnessed on HC ISX threads.

We also know that ASX  [1] as is evidenced re Clayton Utz interference email and
[2]  suspect that ASX  will probably and inexplicably and unfairly continue to add reasons for not lifting the suspension given their actions SINCE  ISX have already met all of the previous requirements [4/out of 4] which were previously dictated by ASX  as required in order for the ASX to lift their suspension of ISX share trading.

How many more conditions will ASX add?  There were 4.  ISX have met all 4.  Per Kevin Lewis's email to Clayton Utz, the ASX have added 2 more conditions.  Does ASX have any legitimate, or legal or regulatory right or authority to keep adding new conditions to be met in order for ISX to resume trading?

Why doesn't the company, ISX shareholders, ASIC, the ACCC have any quicker intervention or recourse in trying to prevent ASX from strangleholding ISX?   There are no buy/held ISX shareholders who have received any reason why ASX suspended ISX shares to date.  ASX's statement of reasons has already been challenged by a Federal Court judge and her statements evidently suggest that ASX did not clearly state or demonstrate or evidence any valid reason why the ASX's SOR could be allowed as submitted by the ASX.

Given Kevin Lewis's email to Clayton Utz - could ASX actually formally list the details of those alleged 2 additional breach conditions and load them into the ASX ISX platform so all shareholders can view them as solid evidence from the ASX  - lifting of ISX trading suspension criteria 5 & 6?