SGH (ASX) Loading up the truck

Originally posted by Tram09 ↑

Let's see, here's Alex, who has
Several censored posts due to Unsubstantiated Information and Flaming;
&
Maintained he does not hold SGH shares, yet later let it slip he has a small holding. Had to retract that comment again when was he was called out;
&
Claimed late march that 24c was market pricing SGH to survive, also that if market was pricing it to fail, price would've been 2.4c. Backtracking yesterday saying the current share price of 27c is market pricing SGH to fail;
&
Wrote two paragraphs of gibberish on "face debt" and misleading interpretation of D/E ratio;
&
Spends more time on HC researching and trashing a stock he claimed he doesn't own (but said he owned but then said he doesn't own) than engaging in the conversation of stocks he actually owns;
&
Posts a link claiming it shows how "diabolical" SGH UK account is, only June 2015 account on the said page is a SGH GROUP A/C that showed consolidated positive cash flow and a consolidated profit prior goodwill write off for the 2015 financial year.

Talking about Pot calling kettle black.

Expand

Good on you for having a go to find error:

- I've never had a small holding, it's a HC glitch that disclosure gets changed, and I've explained this several times. Never retracted my "sell no hold" position.

- market is pricing success at certain level now. If pricing failure: would be 2.4c, just as I said. 27c and 24c are immaterially different unless a day trader

- face value of debt vs. market value debt and what market value equity implies for ratio face/market debt is a fundamental concept applied finance. My comments were 100% accurate, though they may seem gibberish to you. @Nikec has done a diploma in finance - he'll explain why I'm accurate, if he paid attention his studies. Simply: face value = what's owing. Market value = what debt would trade at secondary.

- I don't own stock but have commented before re short, missing some down, since 4/15

- my link to UK Govt website and commentary on the 18 month accounts posted there is exactly accurate. Quindell accounts there are diabolical, my view, though you may say $340m loss over 18 months prior June 15 only "flesh wound".

But, I'm listening, please point me the good news? I change my view as evidence and facts chance and sometimes learn from HC. I have already changed my view since 29/2 that 70/30 chance going zero to 90/10.