The R value is rarely used when testing people, as these tests...

  1. 10,274 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2027
    The R value is rarely used when testing people, as these tests use CT.
    In all honesty, I do not trust using CT.
    Is CT being used to cover up the actual R value of the un-vaccinated verses the vaccinated ?

    Prognostic Value of “Cycle Threshold” in Confirmed COVID ...

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991767
    Objective: To study the correlation between the cycle threshold (CT) of reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test in confirmed COVID-19 patients and the severity of disease. Background: RT–PCR test is a standard method for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. This test is based upon the amplification of the ...

    So R value testing has been frown out the door for CT testing, can these tests be trusted ?
    Only the virus R value is tested, not R value of vaccinated and un-vaccinated people, why ?
    The R value and growth rate - GOV.UK

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-r-value-and-growth-rate

    • State of The UK Epidemic
    • Latest R and Growth Rate For England
    • Other Key Statistics
    • About R and Growth Rate

    • An Rvalue between 0.8 and 1.1 means that, on average, every 10 people infected will infect between 8 and 11 other people. A growth rate of between -3% and 1% means that the number of new infections could be broadly flat, shrinking by up to 3% every day, or growing by up to 1% every day. These estimates represent the transmission of COVID-192 to 3 weeks ago, due to the time delay between someone being infected, developing symptoms, and needing healthcare.
    See more on gov.uk

    Seems like there could be some kind of cover up.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.