manipulation at its best, page-60

There is so much outright false information, assumptions , dot joining , misleading information and to top it off a mass of multiple conspiracy theory in this word salad of a post it is not worth breaking down.

Readers do your own research and confirm all facts as there are a few key things that matter in regard to SPL moving forward so rewriting history with false facts is the least of SPL problems.

Be very cautious in regards to scale trials , time taken with slow enrollment and trial design .

Shareholders for years have had enough information to hold SPL IMO very expensive management accountable or at least get clarity IMO however many posters on this forum believe and keep promoting false assumptions as yo history. SPL management have IMO done a poor job in keeping the less knowledgeable retail investors without decent research skills and access to exports and those holders because they have missed key terminology and specific events still seem to want to defend management and blame with conspiracy theories all failures by SPL on outside parties. It is absolutely crazy dot joining and rainbow chasing .

IMO failures by SPL management to achieve decent agreements with decent partners can either be seen as reflective of management quality or that SPL had not done enough work to show product marketability so partner would be profitable and want to sign a better agreement with SPL or SPL didn't have the skill even with all that external consultant cost . How many times did SPL achieve these IMO poor agreements?

Now the future - Will their new partner ( which IMO they have negotiated from a weak position and agreement term shows this) will they find a decent target in a reasonable time? Will tehy get some decent revenue through lab to support staff numbers as dollars dwindle. To hold their % they will need to contribute or if target is a dud they have consumed time and a dir has received some fees and thats it - nadda.