Hi guys, trying to find the smoking gun. I'm trying to link the...

Hi guys, trying to find the smoking gun. I'm trying to link the most recent substantial holder notice of Ausbil Dexia to Macquarie. Although Macquarie had sort Ausbil Dexia a little while ago (see second link), Ausbil Dexia still seems to be at arms length of Macquarie ... well seems to be. The two entities may have some arrangement regarding their BCI holders, but that would be going into the conspiracy theory world where things are generally over complicated.

I can't shake this thought in my mind that BCI is in the mist of going private. I have not the slightest bit of proof that BCI will, it's just a hunch. It makes complete sense for BCI to go private and that's why I'm thinking BCI eventually will.

I figured that if Ausbil was owned by Macquarie, that there were too many coincidences appearing. Such as Regent selling their shares to Macquarie as well.

A lot of domestic and overseas money is moving from cash/bonds to equity at the moment. It seems that the most obvious conclusion is that Ausbil chose BCI for their clients to receive a better return for their clients than cash or bonds would, and it's as simple as that.


http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130121/pdf/42cjj5q78g146n.pdf

http://www.advfn.com/asx/StockNews.asp?stocknews=MQG&article=52179102