Don't forget that FYI have a payback period of 3.6 years so it will be a long time before they paying back debt.
The greater the $$$ spent, the greater the technical risk, the more that can go wrong, the more likely they will need to go back to shareholders (or dip into the dilutive working capital facility) to pay to resolve any problems.
As an example since AJM completed their Feasibility Study (2016), they have gone from 956M shares on issue to 2.99B shares on issue (around 200% dilution).
On most high capex projects you should assume at least 40% to 50% dilution during financing / construction / commissioning. The AJM example above is an extreme example of what can happen when high capex projects have problems in startup ( for AJM a combination of commissioning problems, the Lithium Price collapse and from memory Offtakers having their own financial problems ).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ADN
- Project CAPEX and Working Capital Comparisons
Project CAPEX and Working Capital Comparisons, page-67
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ADN (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
-0.001(12.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $23.75M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.7¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.7¢ | $368.7K | 52.18M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
38 | 15737810 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.7¢ | 18747793 | 7 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
38 | 15737810 | 0.006 |
19 | 13023333 | 0.005 |
5 | 6475000 | 0.004 |
6 | 9446666 | 0.003 |
5 | 9400498 | 0.002 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.007 | 18747793 | 7 |
0.008 | 9726814 | 13 |
0.009 | 18171694 | 19 |
0.010 | 7777806 | 10 |
0.011 | 14987431 | 7 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ADN (ASX) Chart |