Saturday's gonna pop- Andrews must be brought down, page-113

First 113 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Glug

23,572 Posts.

1

18/09/21

06:59

Post #: 56167300
Share

Originally posted by CornChip: ↑

I don't have the time to go back and investigate and build a timeline of cases from around that time so i cannot answer that definitively.

I can only say that if a case was linked to the protesters the msm would have bombarded us with it extensively.

I would also say that yes public transport close distance without masks would be a risk if they were covid positive. That risk would be there protest or not anyway. If someone was relying on public transport for the protest they probably rely on it day to day also.

There is obviously no way of knowing 100% but there are no confirmed links directly to the protests. The doctors know of the low risk outdoors. The police know of the low risk outdoors. The beachgoers know of the low risk outdoors. Everyone else knows of the low risk outdoors.

This means that the police intervention of the protests means it isn't about covid. Its about keeping the peasants towing the line and stomping out dissent of the government.

Expand

"....if a case was linked to the protesters......there are no confirmed links directly to the protests...."

We don't know where the cases of unknown origin came from, but we know there was a spike that aligns with the protest.

So it is not unreasonable to assume that some of that spike is related to the protest/protestors.

We already know that some of the protestors have a total disregard for the safety of others and the community, so circumstantial evidence leans towards the protest/protestors being the origin for some of the spike in unknown cases.

Just because the origin of the cases is unconfirmed, doesn't exonerate the protest/protestors.

_____________________________________________________

The second week after the protests, [cases more than tripled].
1 Upvote

Reply