I think Clunes may be alluding to LCY being legally and contractually obligated to show haw the offer which will surely state various tranches in relation to Mt Bevan. Since lcy (at present) have no legally binding holding on Mt Bevan haw are privy to the offer. dyor imo
I think Clunes may be alluding to LCY being legally and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 66 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LCY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $138.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1021250 | 1.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8¢ | 1963860 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 31/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LCY (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable