Significance of Milestone 2, page-43

Hi Red,

Consolidating some info here..

Higher Intel book + news article article with Peter talking out of turn + the last AGM Ann=

Present. The current wait. Sp stuck in rut.

AZK officially takes over BC. Bit of a jump in sp..probably not huge news for the market other than an outstanding point..it's offical whatnot..

The really painful wait.. The release of MS2..sp will be quite nice

This release proves the new generation of chip incorporating real life BC chip/s, displaying increased capacity/ability with the amount of neuros now incorporated to handle much more complex tasks more efficiently proving real world application and can be adapted to any future customer requirement.. This is be lovely moment to look forward too with sp, judging on market herd mentality, throw in day traders, intelligent investors but far from the final joy..

Next wait, MS4. The Big jump in sp..

And next outlook. Small wait here.. SP has moved nicely but not at full throttle..

Each and every further chip will need to be designed as dictated by that type of particular customer's specified parameter ie. hear aids, chip to be designed as required will need to to recognise sound. Obviously, as Peter has the base design in place, it'll boil down to adapting per what product needs that kicker in performance..current SNAP time faster than a supercomputer, 5000x.. I'm guessing some products will be easier to adapt/incorporate than others. Not that BC will do anything at this point other than hire out the chip concept-other ppl's problem how long they take to adapt it!! BC just sits back and rakes it in..quite a few royalties coming in here fairly swiftly..

Note. It appears also the more demanding the request dictates the amount of BC chips to be needed (the patent for how the chip 'stores it's learned knowledge' comes through real soon, according to the latest AGM presto. Now would be nice).

Upshot. Full grown. Pfft, there was a wait?? Who wants to guess the SP now??

As previously mentioned, requirements per chip would be dictated by what is specified by customer in aide of improving their particular product.. Peter appeared to indicate from there, once that particular chip's design has been absolutely fulfilled within its developed parameters, if even more performance required, then an extra chip with brand new 'learning ability' would be added..cycle ad infinity..


Yes. It is ALL dependent on translation from soft to hardware..the is this really possible..market will need to see the proof, Peter turning theory into reality..software? Crap!! Imo..but this? And every time faster quicker better at recognising 'stay on track/don't crash!!' Real life..


Have I misinterpreted?