This whole EGO/Marshall fiasco is a telling tale to shareholders.
They should beware of public companies that employ family members in any position, but particularly a position where they have influence in the company's finances or the disemination of information to the public and where there is the slightest indication of the company being run as a feifdom.
Smith V Marshall (Brooke and Kane, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 111 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)