SP discussion, page-34

Excuse me if I don’t compare.

In general terms, it does seem that the Tin sector will play a critical role in global decarbonisation effects. And because Tin is so rare many projects should get up (30x rarer than copper). So, I don’t think there is competition here, it’s just whether or not each project stacks up.

I do think, Tasmania could become a mecca for a secure and stable source of Tin.

I’ve stated before that I’m trying to turn my investment portfolio to more highly rated ESG (Environment / Social / Governance) responsible companies. Therefore, it’s not up to management to say that they have good ESG credentials, the investment community will do that for you. In my view Stellar’s ESG/R credentials rates higher than most. It’s not located in an environmentally sensitive area and it is next to an existing and historic mining town. This provides the capacity to further build on the towns community, social needs and workforce, utilise established roads, power, water and other basic infrastructural needs. Furthermore, Tasmania is now 100% powered entirely by renewable energy.

I see this as a huge benefit for SRZ's Tin projects and what the investing world will be demanding in the new-age technology future that is upon us.

Incidentally, Tin is part of the carbon group of elements, along with graphite, silicon, germanium, lead. The irony being, are we really ‘decarbonising’? The gas yes, the solids no!

All IMO, DYOR, GLTA(Patient)H