Tantalum potential at Dome

Reading back through reports, I look at the 13th January 2017 report and the table of assay results. Possibly we all got excited about the Caesium and Lithium results and didnt see the Tantalum result. Noting the error at the top of the assay pages where Lithium is quoted as ppm and Tantalum is quoted as a percentage. This is an obvious error and should have been corrected , but forgetting that, note the Tantalum assays.Hole o69 6metres at 530 ppm and hole 072 5 metres 432 ppm,hole 075 5 metres at 367 ppm , hole 077 6metres at 250 ppm, hole 79 4 metres at 437 ppm Ta2O5 This is against a background of 70 to 80 ppm. When you consider TA2O5 sells for over US$1000 kg I think this is very significant and would appreciate any comments.