So 'agnostics' (don't think I've ever met a real one) are superior to everyone else? Even the agnostics have 'faith' in their accepted 'evidence' and most simply explain away or ignore evidence that doesn't suit. Agnosticism is only valid as a temporary position while they figure things out if one claims to be a permanent agnostic then I know they are full of it.
Agnosticism is only valid as a temporary position while they figure things out if one claims to be a permanent agnostic then I know they are full of it.
