GUF, decisions to approve or not are taken by the FDA, not the advisory committee. In the case of the 16-2 vote to reject giving youngsters the booster shot I agree 100%.
And their decision on Ivermectin?
Zero safety data.
That's not true.
If the FDA approve it after that vote, after the total lack of safety data has been exposed, then maybe corruption is what we should be looking for.
How long do you give and how much data would you consider for them to approve or not? And their decision on Ivermectin? Do you support it?
Lots of credentials also at the pharma trying to give this to our kids, when they don't need it,
Supply your credentials to contradict any of their decisions.
and there no evidence of safety.
That is not true also.
Forget about credentials and think for yourself.
Is that why you promote Ivermectin? What are your credentials in doing so?
What they are trying to do is why no one trusts the pharmas.
So you are speaking for everyone when you say no one? You must be very credentialed. What are your credentials?
That particular post was not about Ivermectin, but now you mention it "Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba, conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from May 15, 2020, through the end of January 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19." He did it right. He found Ivermectin works. I don't have the credentials to contradict Dr Schwartz either but I believe him.
Did you even read what Prof. Eli Schwartz's trial was? You believe that trial over any the FDA and WHO compiled? I believe the advisory committee who exposed what a crock was being pushed as an approvable vaccine for teens.
Where was it being pushed to be approved for teens? Show the official statements.
