Uk marketing with Amazon interesting, page-7

History with SPL shows there are no mistakes without reason IMO.

You have the ability to assume some numbers and key them in to reverse engineer result and IMO the graph would have looked ugly and had to at every level below 45 be that total non compliance as used as an excuse or failure of treatment?

Simple for SPL to release data and graph to show us and complete the announcement so holders are aware or for CM to add commentary or does she want the share price to collapse? Why not announce the new worldwide marketing plan based on "trial results" ?

I do know what you are saying but I tried many assumptions and all were ugly . SPL tried their hardest and spent a long time to manipulate data set to achieve result above 45 so if it was missing by only a small amount for under 45 my assumption is they would have given a more complete explanation - they chose not to - that indicates all was not well below 45 and they could not spin it!

What do you think is viraleze pathway forward?