Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

OK just ONE computer modelling attempt that has proven to be...

First 31 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
greystone

1,769 Posts.

242

07/07/20

15:34

Post #: 45699908
Share

Originally posted by TillLindemann: ↑

But what specifically are you agnostic on? Would you describe yourself as agnostic on the measurable fact that there has been a heating trend? Do you accept that there is indeed a heating trend, but are agnostic on the cause? Are you agnostic on whether greenhouse gas emissions cause heating? Or do you accept that, and are agnostic on what the consequences of that heating will be?

If you say that it is not warming then you are by definition taking a stance that is not agnostic.

I ask these questions because denialism - as frequently displayed on hotcopper - tends to be very vague and slippery. The same people will say one day there's no warming, the next day they'll say, yes it's warming but it's because of the sun, the next day, yes I accept it's humans but Australia is insignificant.

There is no consistency to their position at all (other than the always reliable references to cults, churches, and Greta).

Expand

OK just ONE computer modelling attempt that has proven to be entirely accurate?
Just one will do.
2 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...

First 31 Last