The whole picture isn't that simple, but (IMO) the part you've highlighted is.
In a nutshell, were there were any semblance of stability or improvement in PUL2.0 scores, the CAPR conversation wouldn't be steeped in complex phrasing like having a 65% mean reduction in PUL2.0 score decline compared to placebo.
This is what your statistician gives you, when told to put a positive spin on the results.
For General Information, page-2451
Add PER (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.32%) |
Mkt cap ! $67.61M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 7.6¢ | 7.7¢ | 7.5¢ | $38.88K | 514.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39300 | 7.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9¢ | 26315 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.19pm 21/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
7.8¢ |
Change
-0.001 ( 1.27 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 7.6¢ | 7.8¢ | 7.5¢ | 112689 | ||
| Last updated 15.50pm 21/05/2024 ? | |||||
| PER (ASX) Chart |